<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>shorette.com · #philosophy</title><link>https://shorette.com/seeds/t/philosophy/</link><description>Seeds tagged #philosophy.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 03:38:00 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://shorette.com/seeds/t/philosophy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>№ 021 · a note</title><link>https://shorette.com/seeds/n021/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://shorette.com/seeds/n021/</guid><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 03:38:00 -0500</pubDate><category>love</category><category>philosophy</category><description>
&lt;p>Some people take up so little of your time, even when you wish they would take more. Yet somehow, they take up so much of your mind. And that&amp;rsquo;s far more precious a resource.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Cut them out then? Maybe. I&amp;rsquo;m not sure I&amp;rsquo;m in the right state of mind to decide.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>№ 018 · a note</title><link>https://shorette.com/seeds/n018/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://shorette.com/seeds/n018/</guid><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 00:41:00 -0500</pubDate><category>love</category><category>philosophy</category><description>
&lt;p>It seems like plenty of great thinkers have arrived at the same paradoxical conclusion that the capacity to be alone is the capacity to love. I think this makes sense when you take a little time to analyze it: if you need the other person, you are turning the other person into a possession/resource. If you are “full” independently, then that turns love into a gift. You can grant the other absolute freedom because whether they stay or leave does not affect your core. I will not cite the exact hadith, but the Prophet made it clear that true riches is self-contentment. What you don&amp;rsquo;t receive from the other, the other cannot take. Two solitudes protect, touch and greet each other.&lt;/p>

&lt;p>Leads to &lt;a href="https://shorette.com/seeds/n012/">Rilke on patience&lt;/a>, &lt;a href="https://shorette.com/books/#book-letters-to-a-young-poet">Letters to a Young Poet&lt;/a>.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>On the honesty of clocks</title><link>https://shorette.com/seeds/t/time/#s-2026-06-16-1304</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://shorette.com/seeds/t/time/#s-2026-06-16-1304</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 13:04:00 -0500</pubDate><category>time</category><category>philosophy</category><description>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Time is a river which sweeps me along, but I am the river. &lt;sup id="fnref:1">&lt;a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">1&lt;/a>&lt;/sup>&lt;/p>&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>I keep returning to this line. The river image only works because the water
is &lt;em>moving&lt;/em> — a still river is just a pond. The honesty of a clock is the
same: it refuses to let the moment pool.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="footnotes" role="doc-endnotes">
&lt;hr>
&lt;ol>
&lt;li id="fn:1">
&lt;p>Borges, J.L. (1946). &lt;em>A New Refutation of Time&lt;/em>.&amp;#160;&lt;a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&amp;#x21a9;&amp;#xfe0e;&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;/li>
&lt;/ol>
&lt;/div>

&lt;p>Leads to &lt;a href="https://shorette.com/">the life-counter&lt;/a>.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>№ 009 · a note</title><link>https://shorette.com/seeds/n009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://shorette.com/seeds/n009/</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 09:31:00 -0500</pubDate><category>philosophy</category><description>
&lt;p>A good question survives its first answer. If the answer closes the subject,
I was probably asking about a fact; if the answer opens three more rooms, I
was asking about something worth carrying.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>On tools that teach</title><link>https://shorette.com/seeds/t/work/#s-2026-04-26-1620</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://shorette.com/seeds/t/work/#s-2026-04-26-1620</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 16:20:00 -0500</pubDate><category>work</category><category>philosophy</category><description>
&lt;p>A good tool does two jobs. It finishes the work in front of you, and it
changes what you believe the work is. The first job is the one we shop for.
The second is the one that shapes us.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>A hand plane teaches grain. A debugger teaches that a program is a sequence
of states rather than a paragraph of intentions. Neither lesson appears in
the manual, and both survive long after the particular task is forgotten.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>So I have grown suspicious of tools that finish the work without teaching
anything. They are not evil; they are simply expensive in a currency that
does not show up on the invoice. When the tool leaves, the understanding
leaves with it, and I am exactly as capable as I was before I began.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The test I apply now is small: after using this thing for a month, will I
know something I could explain to another person? If the answer is no, I try
to keep the tool at arm&amp;rsquo;s length, and do at least one pass by hand.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Absolutely unmixed attention is prayer.</title><link>https://shorette.com/seeds/n006/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://shorette.com/seeds/n006/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 22:53:00 -0500</pubDate><category>attention</category><category>philosophy</category><description>
&lt;blockquote>&lt;p>Absolutely unmixed attention is prayer.&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>— Simone Weil, &lt;em>Waiting for God&lt;/em>&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>