<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>shorette.com · #memory</title><link>https://shorette.com/seeds/t/memory/</link><description>Seeds tagged #memory.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 20:26:00 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://shorette.com/seeds/t/memory/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>What the notebook knows</title><link>https://shorette.com/seeds/t/meta/#s-2026-03-07-2026</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://shorette.com/seeds/t/meta/#s-2026-03-07-2026</guid><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 20:26:00 -0600</pubDate><category>meta</category><category>memory</category><description>
&lt;p>The useful thing about a notebook is not that it remembers. It is that it
disagrees. Memory is a diplomat; it smooths the record until the past appears
to have led sensibly to the present. Paper has no such manners.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I went back this week to entries from four years ago, expecting continuity,
and found a person confidently certain of two things I now think are false.
There was no gradual revision in between. The change happened somewhere off
the page, and I would have sworn under oath that I had always believed the
later version.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>That is the whole case for keeping a record: not nostalgia, and not
productivity, but the ability to be contradicted by primary evidence. It is
the cheapest available protection against becoming a person who has never
been wrong.&lt;/p>

&lt;p>Leads to &lt;a href="https://shorette.com/seeds/t/meta/">#meta&lt;/a>.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>